400th anniversary of Galileo Galilei’s Telescope

400 Years of Modern Astronomy

galileo_galilei_telescopeFour hundred years ago on Tuesday, an Italian professor of physics and mathematics called Galileo Galilei demonstrated a simple contraption to the Venetian Senate that would set in motion one of the most profound revolutions in human thought — a revolution that continues today.

Galileo’s device was a simple telescope — two glass lenses at the ends of a leather tube that magnified objects nine times — and it would forever change our understanding of the universe. Established theories, centuries old, would fall; it would embarrass and anger the Roman Catholic Church; and it would mark the birth of modern astronomy.

But on Aug. 25, 1609, the practical Galileo focused on the telescope’s military benefits: He told the Venetian senators that it would be invaluable in war, since one could see ships sailing into Venice’s harbor a full two hours before they became visible to the naked eye. The Senate, duly impressed, doubled his salary. (The tradition perseveres: Scientists routinely tout military and other applied uses for their research in hopes of securing funding.)

Galileo was not the first to invent the telescope. The previous year, a Dutchman called Hans Lipperhey had filed for a patent on the device in the Hague. (It was not granted since two others had filed similar claims.) In the summer of 1609, Thomas Harriot of England made telescopic observations of the moon. But it was Galileo who made the telescope famous, and with it created modern astronomy.

He worked incessantly to improve his “optick tube.” He first observed the moon, and saw that its surface was marred by craters, mountains and valleys. Nor was it perfectly spherical, as Aristotelian dogma held would be true for heavenly bodies. Turning his telescope to Jupiter, he discovered its moons Io, Europa, Ganymede and Callisto. Observing the Milky Way, he noted that he could see 10 times the number of stars that were visible to the naked eye.

Galileo would go on to catalogue sunspots on the surface of the Sun, in direct conflict with the prevailing view that the heavens were perfect and unchanging, as had been held from the time of the Greeks, and had gotten enshrined by the Church.

Galileo realized that his observations supported the Copernican view of the universe, and not the geocentric view espoused by the Church. In 1543, just before his death, the Polish astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus had published a book on heliocentric cosmology that showed that the Earth didn’t need to be at the center of the universe. It had excited little attention; it was only Galileo’s observations and Johannes Kepler’s laws of planetary motion — also published in 1609 — that would help Copernicanism supplant Ptolemaic astronomy, the erroneous theory of celestial mechanics that had held sway for 1,400 years.

In March, 1610 Galileo published Siderius Nuncius (Starry Messenger), a 24-page booklet that documented his observations. Unlike scientific treatises of the day that tended to be voluminous and written in baroque prose, Galileo’s remarkable treatise was highly readable. It started an intellectual fever that spread contagiously across Europe.

It was all heresy to the Catholic Church, and Galileo was persecuted by the Inquisition for his views. It took almost four centuries, but in 2000, Pope John Paul II formally apologized for the trial of Galileo.

Today, Galileo’s intellectual heirs continue to expand our horizons. There have been huge improvements in the science of telescopes. State-of-the-art, Earth-based telescopes are now mammoth structures, with mirrors that exceed 30 feet across — devices that would have been completely unimaginable to Galileo and his immediate successors. Some of our clearest views of space have come from the Hubble Space Telescope, a technological wonder that continues to provide one of the clearest views into the universe.

We know now that universe is about 13.7 billion years old and contains billions and billions of stars and galaxies. We live an insignificant corner of the Milky Way galaxy, orbiting a rather ordinary star. Our view of the cosmos has both expanded, and at the same time we have lost the special place once accorded to us.

And we may be getting ready for a discovery as dramatic as the fact the Earth is not the center of the universe: that life exists elsewhere. The list of extra-solar planets has been growing. There are currently about 360 such exoplanets known. Many scientists believe that life is not unique to Earth, and the processes that gave rise to life on our planet are common in the universe.

Kepler, a NASA space telescope named after Johannes Kepler that was launched in March, is currently looking for Earth-like planets that have suitable conditions to support life. On Aug. 6th, NASA announced that Kepler is working very well, and has found a exoplanet within 10 days of starting work. (This planet is too hot for life as we know it.) And just last week, we learned that the amino acid glycine — a key building block of life — had been found in a comet, strengthening the case for extraterrestrial life. While we do not know whether extraterrestrial life will ever be found, if it is found, it will only extend the revolution that Galileo started 400 years ago.

by: www.nytimes.com

Hydrogen: green or not green?

The dirty source of the world’s first clean-hydrogen power plant

powerA Venice, Italy power plant made headlines this week as the first in the world fueled exclusively by hydrogen, and rightly so. But most of the news organizations–including the Associated Press and The New York Times–that rewrote the press release from Enel, Italy’s largest electricity producer, barely noted the source of the plant’s hydrogen: petrochemical plants that manufacture plastics.

And there are no plastics in Ecotopia. Venice’s emission-free power is a byproduct, essentially, of the main ingredients of plastic shopping bags, synthetic rubber, and polyvinyl chloride (PVC), also known as “the poisonous plastic.”

The Enel plant receives its hydrogen from an adjacent ethylene cracker operated by Polimeri Europa. Ethylene crackers mix hydrocarbons with steam and heat to produce ethylene, an organic hydrocarbon that serves, among other things, as an ingredient in plastic bags; butadiene, an ingredient in synthetic rubber; and styrenics, used in such products as styrofoam and PVC. The Enel plant also receives hydrogen from a Syndial PVC plant. All are located in Porto Marghera, a notoriously polluted industrial park on the mainland side of the Venice Lagoon.

Friends of the plastics industry will be quick to point out the better accomplishments of plastics, like life-saving medical devices and the replacement of even more energy intensive forms of packaging. And perhaps using a byproduct of plastics to produce clean energy is like finding the silver lining in a dark cloud. But the great accomplishment of the Venice plant, finding that cheap hydrogen, leaves it dependent on an industry that pollutes.

The petrochemical plants previously used the surplus hydrogen to produce heat for their own operations.

Hydrogen power plants are just over the horizon in the United States. Jetstream Wind is building one now in Truth or Consequences, New Mexico that will use solar and wind power to separate water into hydrogen and oxygen. The hydrogen will be burned to produce energy. When burned, it recombines with oxygen to produce water vapor without producing carbon dioxide. That’s why hydrogen is considered clean.

“Basically, it’s a scaled-up model of eighth-grade science,” Jetstream CEO Henry Herman told the Associated Press. “In eighth grade we took DC batteries, ran cables into water and produced hydrogen gas. All we’re doing is utilizing that on a much larger scale.”

But the energy produced at that plant will cost up to four times the amount that energy now costs in Truth or Consequences, according to the AP. Those numbers should improve over time, as the wind and solar facilities pay for themselves, but this strategy leaves hydrogen produced by renewables at a disadvantage compared to the less clean Italian model.

Hydrogen power from polluting industry: green or not green?

by: trueslant.com

Italy: first clean hydrogen power plant

Italy launches first clean hydrogen power plant

fusina_nowItalian power company Enel said Friday that it had started up a ground-breaking hydrogen-powered electricity plant producing no greenhouse gases.

Enel said the 12 megawatt plant, at Fusina in Venice’s industrial zone of Porto Marghera, was the first of its kind in the world to operate on such a scale.

Powered by hydrogen by-products from local petrochemical industries such as the Eni group’s Polimeri Europa factory, it can meet the needs of 20,000 families, while saving emissions equivalent to more than 17,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide a year, according to Enel.

The power station forms part of a project dubbed Hydrogen Park, which is backed by the Venice region and Italy’s environment minister to the tune of four million euros (5.6 million dollars).

The project aims to develop research into the uses of hydrogen, a clean gas which produces only water when it burns.

by: AFP

Adriatic Sea threatens Venice

Many tourists visiting the northern Italian city of Venice don’t realise the city’s very foundations are threatened by the water it’s been famous for.

water_veniceEnvironmental scientists say Venice has been slowly sinking for centuries.

Canals, gondolas and vaporetti, or water taxis. They are the familiar landmarks of Venice.

But the city’s existence has been precarious because of its position. It’s built on water, and it is also threatened by water on several fronts.

Jane Da Mosto, Environmental Scientist, said, “In a way Venice has always been in peril. Ever since the city was founded it’s been in this delicate

state of not exactly equilibrium but balance between land and water.”

Scientists say the whole of northeast Italy where Venice is, is tipping gradually downwards. And Venice has been going down by about eight

centimeters a century.

The level of the Adriatic Sea is rising. High tides are becoming more frequent, flooding into the famed St. Mark’s Square. The city has had to set

up raised walkways.

Moreover, it is not only the fabled city that is sinking into the water.

Anna Somers Cocks, Chairman of Venice in Peril, said, “It is reaching the edge of the stone base now and the water is beginning to lap against the

brickwork which is why the houses are all desperately damp.”

For those living and working here, maintaining an old, constantly damp house and buying food that has to be brought in by boat is not cheap.

Gherardo Ortelli, History Professor, University of Venice, said, “When two young people marry here, they have to leave. They cannot afford to

live in Venice.”

But compared with a declining population, the chief threat to Venice comes from the water.

Huge liners create a wash that erodes foundations. Smaller vessels also cause waves that lap up against stone bases.

Somers Cocks believes the government needs long-term plans to save Venice.

Anna Somers Cocks, Chairman of Venice in Peril, said, “We need a plan for 50 years, even a hundred years.”

Scientists believe Venice is likely to survive, because it has all that’s necessary within it to carry on forever. But they say it’s a question

of deciding what kind of Venice should survive.

da CCTV.COM